# Business rules — loginscreen-uriel

Evidence date: 2026-10-10.

Source repository: `git@bitbucket.org:overdrive/loginscreen-uriel.git`, `master` at `2ba8ff2`.

## Result of the search

No business rule is implemented or documented.

The repository has no application code, no schema, no validation, no permission check, and no workflow. Rules cannot be inferred from behaviour that is not there. Inventing login, password, session, or role rules from the repository name would present a guess as a domain rule.

## What was examined

| Place | What it contains | Rule found |
|---|---|---|
| `README.md` | Bitbucket's empty template. Headings mention setup, a database, tests, deployment, and contribution guidelines. No value is filled in | None. The headings are not constraints |
| Git history | One commit, 2020-02-27, "README.md created online with Bitbucket" | None |
| Other paths | No other tracked file | None |

## Rules that are absent

The following areas have no rule in this repository. Each is **Unknown / Requires Confirmation** if a human later says this project was meant to be a login screen:

- Who may sign in, and with which identifier.
- How a password is chosen, stored, or checked.
- What happens on a failed attempt, a lockout, or an expired session.
- Whether registration, recovery, or an administrator exists.
- Any data that must be unique, required, or retained.

## Contribution text

The README section "Contribution guidelines" lists "Writing tests", "Code review", and "Other guidelines" as bullets with no further text. That is **Documented** template copy. It does not state a review policy or a test requirement.

## Access

No authentication, role, or tenancy rule exists in the tree. Git author metadata (`uriel <uriel@overdrive.co.za>`) records who created the README. It is not an application permission model.